Oh
g'w'on...typos are trivial, they don't mean anything! No one really
cares, because everyone knows what I mean. And besides, they're
funny! We're all human and make mistakes. So what! We "don't
see” them when we read because our brain knows what the word is
supposed to say.
Right?
No,
not right. A few infamous reasons why:
- In 2004, Philadelphia Judge Jacob P. Hart included in his ruling a massive reduction in attorney fees due to excessive typos, to the tune of $31,350.
- In 2005 one of the costliest business errors was made when a Japanese bank sold shares of one of its companies on the Tokyo stock exchange. No problem, easy to do. However, instead of selling each single share at 610,000 yen, a “minor” typographical error placed the order at 610,000 shares at one (1) yen each. Damage done: the equivalent of $340 million.
- We can go as far back as 1631 to see proofreading issues. English royal printers Robert Barker and Martin Lucas were to reproduce the King James Bible. Kudos to them for only having ONE error in 783,137 words! But they lost their business license anyway and were fined the equivalent of $50,000 (£300 then). For one little error? I think readers would probably not mentally “fix” "Thou shalt commit adultery." It became known as the “Wicked Bible” and rumor has it that 11 copies are still out there.
The
cost of typos for businesses each year is in the millions. In this
day and age of social media and instant ability to “let the world
know,” company reputations can be seriously damaged,
professionalism and even competence questioned, branding damaged,
charges of false advertising or bait-and-switch (see Alitalia example
below), and the backlash from angry customers with instant access to
the consuming world. Customers, both present and potential, begin to
ask themselves “Is anyone there even paying attention to what they
are publishing?”
Alitalia barely rescued a bit of its reputation in a “goodwill” gesture in 2006 when a typographical error offered business-class flights from Toronto to Cyprus for $39 instead of the usual $3,900. After up to 2,000 tickets were sold, Alitalia attempted to cancel the tickets, prompting a backlash in public relations. The decision to cut its losses of in excess of $7.2 million and market its “goodwill gesture” allowed them to protect its reputation.
Could
every company rescue itself like this? Is a lack of proofreading
worth the risk?
A
single misplaced character or comma can have extreme financial
consequences in the insurance industry. See “The
$759 million comma,” by Jerry Trupin in the Insurance
Advocate,
October 13, 2014.
You
may think that these are extreme cases and the odds are in your favor
that your spellcheck is up to the task of making sure your document
says what you want, and your grammar checker will highlight every
sentence it sees as questionable. I'm sure no one will notice that
the design of your paper “complimented” your envelope instead of
“complemented” it. Or that everyone would realize that 3
tablespoons isn't all that much different from 3 teaspoons, or that
three-quarters of a cup cannot be lazily translated to “it's very
close to a cup, so it must be about 250 milliliters.”
This
all tells us that there cannot be enough importance given to
proofreading and copyediting at every point of content creation.
Recent economic trends have seen a shift in where to spend money for
businesses, allowing for “oh a little typo and a little
embarrassment isn't worth the money we'd have to spend for a
proofreader.” Word processing programs can identify and correct
typographical errors, but there is a limit to what they can do, and
can never substitute for a professional proofreader.
Make
sure that what you write, submit and/or publish can be held to the
higher quality that is demanded today, offering higher value,
surpassing your target's expectations and ranks you as high as you
hope to be. Don't make the mistake of disregarding the fact that
inadequate proofreading can result in a single keystroke disaster.
3 comments:
The era of self-publishing (unproofreading?) is entrenched in Internet information bites. "I see a typo, but I get the gist of the article", or some such event, therefore no worries. Self-publishing also is guilty of bypassing proof reading and editors.
And there are the two factions: those that spot the typos and those that ignore (ignorant?). The spotters will rise to the occasion and demand a rewrite, while the majority - the skippers - will ignore completely.
I spot typos in books I read that I get from the library. I read primarily Biographies and Autobiographies and Memoirs. I spot maybe 2 books in five that have some overlooked word or phrasing and I wonder how it happened. What is it with the situation these days?
Yes, thank goodness not every book contains errors and it's true we can "read through them." However, they have no place in business as they can cause huge problems. Thanks for the comment!
Write on, Maria!
Jerry Trupin
Post a Comment